The Supreme Court of Germany issued a ruling on December 1st, 2022 concerning the European Court of Justice (ECJ) reclaim submitted by the College Pension Plan of British Columbia, a Canadian pension fund. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of the ECJ reclaim by the Federal Tax Court of Munich in December 2021, which meant that the German withholding taxes levied on dividends could not be refunded. The Supreme Court justified its decision by asserting that the Federal Tax Court of Munich had fulfilled the requirements outlined by the ECJ. This legal dispute has its origins in the ECJ case of November 13th, 2019 (C-641/17), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) determined...
Following the Austrian Supreme Administrative Court “Verwaltungsgerichtshof – (VwGH)” decision on 28 June 2022 (Ro 2022/13/0002) concerning short-term Cum-Ex-Trades and withholding tax refunds, the Austrian Ministry of Finance (MoF) published a new information letter on the 15 November 2022 with regards to the attribution of dividends for income and tax relief eligibility purposes. The newly published guidelines replace the previous guidelines, published in 2014, regarding the eligibility to dividends and withholding tax relief entitlement for non-resident shareholders. In accordance with established stock exchange practice, shares are traded with dividend rights (cum-dividend) up until a specific key date, known as ex-date. Shares traded on or after this date no longer transfer rights to an upcoming dividend (ex-dividend trading). The ex-date is...
For the last two decades, WTax has been at the forefront of providing end-investors with access to tax technical expertise and expedited reclaim processing through proprietary reclaim technology, ensuring any eligible tax yield is obtained and the associated administrative burden of the ever-evolving and complex withholding tax reclaim process is alleviated. Throughout this time, WTax has built strong working relationships and operational workflows with foreign tax authorities and over 150 custodians, brokers and International Central Securities Depositories (ICSDs) globally. WTax’s global expansion has translated into a thorough understanding of the custody tax process and an acute awareness of the challenges custodians often face when it comes to delivering agile tax service solutions within the heightened sensitivity of time-to-market delivery. The...
On July 9, 2021, the Spanish Official Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado – BOE) published a major change in Spanish law 11/2021 in relation to measures to prevent and combat tax fraud. The law transposes Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164, laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, amending various tax rules and matters concerning gambling regulation. The law entails a substantial change for Spanish open-ended investment companies with variable capital (SICAVs). Under current Spanish tax legislation, certain Spanish Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) (SICAVs included) are taxed at a reduced Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rate of 1% in accordance with article 29.4.a) of the Spanish law 27/2014, of November...
During the course of October, WTax attended two conferences hosted by Hansuke Consulting: Operational Taxes for Investment Firms, and the Financial Services Tax Conference: Taxation in Times of Crisis. Two significant themes emerged from the insightful discussions held, namely, the evolution of the taxation landscape, and trust in the end-to-end taxation system. With gratitude to Hansuke and the expert panellists who spoke, WTax is echoing our taxation-professional peers’ calls to lean into technology developments to effectively manage an increasingly globalised tax landscape. The industry is required to embed compliance within tax systems, become more agile, mitigate risk, and restore trust. If we were to summarise the key learnings in two words, “Tax Integrity” would be an accurate fit. We have...
Overview - How to Make the Most of Your Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) Investments Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) focused investments have grown by more than 750% since they were first mentioned in the 2006 United Nation’s Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) report. With the considerable growth in ESG investing, ESG factors are being incorporated within the financial evaluation of companies. At the time of writing, there are 4996 signatories, composed of asset owners, asset managers and service providers who represent over $121 trillion in assets under management per the latest PRI report The consideration of ESG factors is of increasing importance for investors and has become a critical component of investment decision-making in recent years. The...
On 7 June 2022, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom (UK) signed a new double tax treaty (“DTT”) and a supplementary Protocol that will replace the previous DTT signed in 1967. The new treaty conforms with the latest international tax standards agreed upon by the OECD and includes positive changes that will be beneficial for Luxembourg’s collective investment vehicles (“CIVs”) and pension funds. The treaty has not yet entered into force and is still to be ratified by Luxembourg and the UK. The earliest date that the below provisions in respect of withholding taxes are expected to become effective is the 1st of January 2023. The new DTT could apply as soon as 2023 depending on the efficiency of the Luxembourg and...
The Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), hereafter the “Court”, issued six judgements (Nos. 21454, 21475, 21479, 21480, 21481 and 21482) on 6 July 2022 relating to United States (US) open-ended investment funds and another judgement (No. 21598) on 7 July 2022 relating to a German open-ended investment fund. The Court established that withholding taxes levied on dividends paid by Italian issuers to foreign investment funds, as far as comparable Italian investment funds were exempt from or subject to a lower rate of withholding tax, is incompatible with the principle of free movement of capital as set out in Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). These rulings are significant as they collectively constitute the...
In the case A SCPI v. Finland (C-342/20), a decision on 7 April 2022 by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found that Finnish legislation, which exempted contractual investment funds from paying income tax, while comparable corporate foreign investment funds were subject to income tax, is contrary to EU Law. The Applicant’s Case against Finland’s Tax Exemption Regime The tax exemption under question in case C-342/20 is contained in §20a of the Finnish Income Tax Act. The tax exemption, which came into effect on 1 January 2020, exempts foreign contractual based investment funds from Finnish income tax, while investment funds established under a different (corporate) legal form are not privy to this exemption. Although the case specifically...
The Provincial Tax Court of Pescara issued a judgement on 7 February 2022 (Decision No. 49). The judgement established that a Luxembourg SICAV (Société d'investissement à Capital Variable) in accordance with the Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament (“UCITS Directive”) is eligible for a full refund of Italian withholding taxes levied on dividends. The judgement’s determining factor is that the Luxembourg SICAV is deemed comparable to an Italian investment fund. This is a significant favourable ruling for foreign investment funds with Italian investments. The ruling is also consistent with the legal precedent established by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) upholding the free movement of capital. Facts and Circumstances Leading to the Appeal The most recent case...
Historic Treatment of Foreign Sourced Income From 2004 until 1 January 2022, Foreign Sourced Income (“FSI”) received in Malaysia by Malaysian taxpayers was exempt from income tax under Paragraph 28, Schedule 6 of the Income Tax Act, 1967, apart from a resident company carrying on the business of banking, insurance or sea or air transport. The Changes in Tax Treatment of FSI in Malaysia The government announced during the 2022 budget that effective from 1 January 2022, the tax exemption which was available to Malaysian tax residents on income received in Malaysia from FSI, will be removed. The Ministry of Finance later announced that a tax exemption will be provided to the below groups of tax residents on FSI received...
CJEU Advocate General Issues Opinion on Finnish Tax Exemption Relating to Investment Funds On 6 October 2021, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued an opinion on case C-342/20 Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Exonération des fonds d’investissement contractuels) pertaining to Finland’s tax-exemption regime for contractual investment funds. The Advocate General concluded that this regime contains a restriction on the free movement of capital. The opinion of the Advocate General follows an earlier judgment by the CJEU on 9 April 2021 in case C-480/19 which held that the income received from a foreign corporate-form fund should not be treated differently from the income received from a Finnish contractual-based fund for Finnish tax purposes because the funds...
WHT can be as high as 35% when investing internationally, which results in a material impact on investment performance. In some instances, WHT recovery can increase dividend yields by up to 50 basis points. To compile and submit a successful WHT claim, information and documentation need to be sourced from the underlying investor, financial intermediaries, custodians and sub-custodians. In addition to sourcing this information, challenges such as completing onerous claim forms, dealing with language barriers, navigating points of contact at foreign tax offices and collating supporting documentation further complicates the process. Once claims are successful, there are further hurdles to address, such as dealing with queries from tax offices as well as tracking and accounting for recoveries when repayment dates...
Cross-border taxation is complicated at the best of times. However, harnessing the refund opportunities embodied in taxation legislation can be even more daunting for any investment firm’s finance team. Julia Bricker, withholding tax expert and Managing Director of WTax North America, states that investors are often not recovering all available withholding tax. If you are looking for a simple route when it comes to securing a successful withholding tax reclaim, then you should look to the experts to handle the administrative burden. Should you wish to confront this task yourself, success will depend on your depth of knowledge and endurance as the process has many steps and requires persistence. “A True North” to Successful Refunds Unfortunately, there is no fast...
Overview and Case Outcome The much-anticipated Danish Supreme Court judgement in respect of the Fidelity Funds Case (Case 59/2019) was finally handed down on 24 June 2021. The main question posed in the Fidelity Funds case was whether it is in line with EU law that foreign investment funds suffer withholding tax on dividends distributed from Danish shares, while Danish resident investment funds which have elected to be taxed under section 16C of the Tax Assessment Act (TAA) (often referred to as “investment funds with minimum taxation”) are exempt from tax on Danish-sourced dividends. The Supreme Court judgement dealt a blow to foreign investment funds which were hoping for a favourable outcome. The ruling that foreign investment funds investing in...
A judgement rendered by the Court of Justice in the European Union (CJEU) on 29 April 2021 in case C-480/19 - Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö (Revenus versés par des OPCVM) (“C-480/19”), could help non-Finnish corporate form investment funds (such as Luxembourg SICAVs) justify their eligibility for preferential Finnish withholding tax treatment going forward. Unlisted Luxembourg SICAVs have suffered unfavourable withholding taxes on Finnish sourced dividends for many years, but a new CJEU ruling could be the start of full withholding tax recovery for corporate-form investment funds. Disparate Treatment of Foreign and Domestic Entities Under Finnish Tax Law According to Finnish domestic legislation (Section 3 of the Act on the Taxation of Non-residents' Income) dividends paid by a Finnish issuer to a foreign...
Access to WHT Reclaim Reporting As an investor, the importance of optimizing foreign withholding tax (WHT) recoveries cannot be overstated. Reducing tax drag has an appreciable effect on investment performance, even more so if the reclaimed funds are reinvested over an extended period. However, achieving such optimization is a rather complex task that requires sophisticated analytics and technical knowledge. The basis for an accurate analysis of an investor’s WHT position and its overall impact on investment yield is premised on access to data, data transparency and technical expertise. As an asset manager or an investor, a plethora of reporting is readily available. However, whilst it is relatively easy to obtain data on withholding taxes, it’s not so simple to evaluate....
It’s often said that the only constant in life is change, and that the only certainties are death and taxes. Withholding tax on investment income is undoubtedly one of these certainties, but the industry is on the cusp of momentous shifts in the way taxes are levied, recovered and tracked. Withholding tax contributes considerable revenues to investment jurisdictions around the world but the landscape is changing. The complexity and rate of change is making it increasingly difficult for global investors to keep track of the tax consequences of their investment decisions while also minimising their withholding tax leakage. Tax Authorities Continue to Raise the Burden of Proof The last 20 years have been filled with scandals against foreign tax authorities....
Recently proposed amendments to Denmark’s tax laws are expected to rectify the discriminatory withholding tax treatment of certain comparable Danish and foreign entities. On 14 April 2021, the Danish Government presented a bill proposal to Parliament suggesting changes to Danish tax law to align the taxation of dividends of non-residents with EU law. The bill is largely as a result of the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in case C- 480/16, Fidelity Funds. Under the bill (Bill No. L 211), the Danish tax treatment of certain domestic and foreign entities is expected to become more equitable, which will positively impact non-resident charities which hold Danish shares. How Danish Tax Law Currently Treats Comparable Foreign...
Understanding the Basics of Double Taxation on Investment Income Put simply, double taxation occurs when two countries tax the same income. For example, in the context of international equity investments, when a domestic resident derives dividend income from a foreign investment country, the foreign tax authorities tax the income, based on the fact that it is considered to be taxable in their jurisdiction. In addition, the domestic resident is usually also liable to pay tax on the dividends in their domestic country as residents are generally taxed on their worldwide earnings. Hence, the dividend income may be taxed twice. Double taxation agreements (otherwise referred to as double taxation treaties) have been enacted between countries to, among other functions, eliminate or...
In February 2021, Hong Kong’s Financial Services and The Treasury Bureau (FSTB) issued a proposal for easier migration of foreign funds to Hong Kong, in order to encourage more locally domiciled funds and thereby boost the investment market in Hong Kong. Re-domiciliation is not a new industry concept; many major fund jurisdictions have introduced necessary measures to ensure that this is an easy and seamless process for market players. Jersey, the British Virgin Islands, Luxembourg, Ireland and more recently Singapore, with their Variable Capital Company (VCC) structure introduced in early 2020, are of a few notable jurisdictions that have created a more conducive and attractive environment for funds to re-domicile. Hong Kong’s Case for Re-Domiciliation Hong Kong, a major regional...
In the world of cross-border tax, it has been challenging for the European Commission to harmonise the different regulations and laws that govern EU-law based withholding tax reclaims. This adds complexity for institutional investment firms which need to navigate the withholding tax reclaim opportunities available to them through double taxation treaty agreements and previous tax discrimination case law commonly known as European Court of Justice claims. EU law-based withholding tax reclaims via double taxation agreements The most common method of reclaiming foreign withholding taxes from Europe is by applying double taxation agreements. These agreements exist between the country of residence of the beneficiary of the income and the investment country. A withholding tax refund opportunity exists when there is a...
Pension funds are usually tax-exempt in their home country but this is not always the case when they hold investments in foreign jurisdictions and, in most cases, the onus is on the pension fund to prove its tax-exempt status, when trying to reduce or eliminate foreign withholding taxes on investment income. Despite the availability of tax exemptions from foreign tax authorities, pensions funds don’t always maximize the refund opportunities available. The increased complexity and volume of documentation required by international tax authorities has resulted in an ever-growing backlog of outstanding tax claims and queries imposed on pension fund personnel. To reduce foreign withholding tax leakage, pension funds generally have Relief at Source available which is usually facilitated by the custodian bank. In...
The asset management industry was in a state of flux, even before Covid-19, with an increased emphasis on the reduction of costs and the maximisation of returns. Meeting and even exceeding the demands of clients has become the norm and clients expect their investment managers to be at the forefront of the latest technologies and solutions. It is therefore imperative that the investment community stay abreast of and apply the various technological developments in the fields of process automation and artificial intelligence. The benefits of non-core outsourcing Historically, asset managers have embraced outsourcing, since it became apparent that there is inherent value in focusing solely on the primary or core business. This in turn resulted in the creation of custodians,...
What is WTax? WTax is a wholly outsourced provider of foreign withholding tax recovery. Any parties seeking to maximise their withholding tax refund can look to WTax for an end-to-end technology-driven service. WTax assists with withholding tax refunds using three reclaim mechanisms: Double taxation agreements Domestic legislation exemptions European Court of Justice (ECJ) claims Leveraging off a global presence and a deep knowledge of the methodologies and treaties, WTax considers itself your premium outsourced indirect tax team, ensuring minimised tax leakage. Who is WTax? WTax is a division of the VAT IT Group, a multinational indirect tax services provider. WTax helps institutional investors and funds across 107 jurisdictions globally, through our 40 wholly-owned offices worldwide. WTax has successfully recovered withholding...
Introduction to SMAs Separately Managed Accounts (SMAs) are portfolios of individual assets managed by a professional money manager on behalf of an investor. Instead of investing in traditional mutual funds or Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), where securities are pooled or track an index, SMAs allow investors to own the assets directly. SMAs have traditionally been reserved for high net worth individuals or institutional investors as the account minimums usually range between $100k-$250k or higher. Not only does this allow investors to take advantage of their personal tax situations but it adds a degree of flexibility to the investments they hold. Instead of following a model portfolio based on a specific investment strategy, the investor can customise their portfolio to exclude...
A recent update published by the French tax authorities (FTA) on the 12th of August 2020 offers revised guidelines as to the requirements non-European Union (EU) collective investment funds must meet, in order to be entitled to withholding tax exemptions on French source dividends, pursuant to Article 119 bis, 2 of the French Tax Code. Historical tax treatment of non-EU collective investment funds In keeping with the mandate of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (specifically Articles 63 to 65), EU member states are prohibited from treating comparable Collective Investment Vehicles (CIVs) differently, based solely on where they are resident. In order to reflect this, French tax law has, since 2012, allowed for certain foreign CIVs to...
By guest author Max Reed. Max is a cross-border tax lawyer and the founding partner of Polaris Tax Council Canada. WTax partners with Polaris Tax Council in recovering US withholding tax for investors of Canadian pooled funds. Many Canadian tax-exempt investors invest in US equities through a standard Canadian pooled fund. This means that they pay the 15% US dividend withholding tax on US equity investments. This can be refunded. To illustrate, assume that a Canadian charity invests in Apple stock through a standard Canadian pooled fund. When the dividend is issued by Apple to the pooled fund, the 15% US dividend withholding tax is collected by the pooled fund and sent to the US Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). However,...
Earlier this year, WTax outlined some of the withholding tax implications of Brexit (click here). This article explores the latest developments, on how the UK’s official withdrawal from the EU will affect the withholding taxes levied on UK-domiciled funds, once the transitional period ends at the end of 2020. This is in light of the European Commission’s announcement on the 7th of July 2020, in which it was confirmed and stakeholders were informed that as from the end of the transition period (31 December 2020), the EU rules in the field of asset management — in particular Directive 2009/65/EC on Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (“UCITS Directive”) and Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers (“AIFM Directive”) —...
There is a great deal to be gained from understanding the inner workings of international withholding tax (WHT) recovery – especially when it comes to dividend income. Institutional investment firms stand to increase their clients’ ROI on foreign investments by up to 0.5% by simply unlocking the various dividend WHT reclaim methodologies. If you want to know more about international withholding tax recovery, this article will provide a good foundation. What is international withholding tax? Most tax authorities see an event that generates income as an opportunity to levy a tax on that income. International withholding tax is incurred when an investor domiciled in one country receives income from dividends or interest paid by an entity domiciled in another (foreign)...
While global markets continue to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and uncertainty still lingers around the immediate future of dividends, investment firms should be looking for sound and innovative ways to boost investment performance. One such avenue should be unlocking withholding tax (WHT) refunds – an overlooked cash injection that in the past may have been considered immaterial. However, during challenging times, a 0.5% increase in investment performance can be a real silver lining and a way to reduce the effects of the current downturn. How can withholding tax recovery contribute to investment performance? Institutional investors are eligible to recover some or all of the foreign tax suffered on foreign dividend and interest income. They can recoup as much as...
Should you be accruing for withholding tax recoveries on foreign investment income or should these recoveries should rather be accounted for on a cash basis? In the accounting world, the eternal goal is to ensure that financial records accurately reflect the financial position of a particular entity at a point in time. This generally means accounting for transactions when they occur as opposed to when the cash implications are felt. As a global withholding tax recovery specialist, WTax is constantly asked by its clients whether they should be accruing for withholding tax recoveries on foreign investment income or whether these recoveries should rather be accounted for on a cash basis. In most markets, investment income attracts withholding tax for foreign...
Withholding tax recovery opportunities unfortunately don’t exist forever. Every investment market has a statute of limitation for withholding tax (WHT) recovery claims to be filed. This means that each claim has an expiry date and the claims must be filed before this date, to ensure that the recovery is not lost. Statutes of limitation are tax authority prescribed deadlines for filing WHT claims and are defined in domestic tax legislation or double taxation agreements. Generally, these range anywhere from 2 to 6 years from the end of the calendar year of dividend payment. For example, in France, the statute of limitation is typically 2 years from the end of the year of dividend payment. This means that WHT recovery claims...
Collective Investment Trusts (CITs) or group trusts as they are commonly referred to, are addressed in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 81-100 (as modified by Revenue Ruling 2004-67, Revenue Ruling 2011-1 and Revenue Ruling 2014-24). The IRS provided special dispensation for CITs in the form of exemption from income tax to ensure that these structures can be used to pool assets of various qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts and other similar plans without creating unnecessary income tax obligations. The goal is to ensure that pension-related money and the returns earned through investing that money, are not eroded through income taxes. CITs have become increasingly popular to improve efficiencies both operationally and from a cost perspective, when US retirement...
For many years, the US investment vehicle landscape has had a strong affinity to Cayman domiciled structures. Immense benefits can be achieved for US tax-exempt investors as well as non-US investors in US structures through the use of offshore, Cayman Islands domiciled feeder funds. However, in setting up these structures, withholding tax (and the ability to reclaim taxes incurred on foreign investment income) is often overlooked. As is common for most tax havens, the Cayman Islands doesn’t have a network of double taxation agreements which can be utilized to minimize taxes incurred on foreign dividend and interest earnings. Traditionally, many Cayman-domiciled feeder funds were established as Cayman limited companies. These Ltd. entities were non-transparent in nature (unless they ‘checked the...
2020 has certainly been a challenging year and very few corporates around the world will be unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic. It’s no surprise that dividend payouts have decreased drastically and in this uncertain time, it’s difficult to predict how long this downturn will last. Media sources such as Forbes and CNBC commented on the significant decreases in dividend payouts over the last few months, as businesses take mitigating steps against the effects of the pandemic Janus Henderson's latest Global Dividend Index, published in May, warned that the impact of the pandemic for the rest of the year "will be significant" with dividend cuts already announced or likely impending and set to wipe at least 15%, or $213bn, off this...
This is because the claims are highly complex and require a deep knowledge of the legislation, past court cases and legal precedent set to be able to achieve refunds. Moreover, in most cases, custodians (who are often an investor’s go-to point for DTT claims) are generally unable to help with ECJ claims. What is the European Court of Justice in the context of Withholding Taxes? All countries that form part of the now 27-Member States of the European Union (EU) are subject to the laws and regulations set by the EU. The Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) are the two main sources of EU law. The role of the...
Last month, the Swedish Supreme Administrative Court issued a milestone judgement stating that Swedish tax authorities should not deny withholding tax refunds (that were requested based on EU Law) to a US investment fund, based on the Fund’s legal structure. This is good news for the international investment community seeking withholding tax refunds from Sweden and whose applications may have been rejected over the past 3 years. The Supreme Court’s decision confirms that the mere fact that a foreign investment fund has legal personality doesn’t mean that the fund is not comparable to a Swedish investment fund. At the very least, it means that non-UCITS investment funds that were considered to be separate legal entities, such as U.S. RICs (Regulated...
In several judgements regarding withholding taxes on Italian investment income, it came as a surprise to many when Italian tax courts found that the dividend withholding tax (WHT) regime applicable to non-resident recipients may be seen to be discriminatory in certain cases and thus in violation of the principle of the free movement of capital as evidenced by CJEU case-law. This line of reasoning has recently been upheld by the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) in their judgement (No. 1967/2020 published on 29 January 2020) where it ruled that a Spanish pension fund should be entitled to a refund of the withholding tax on dividend payments from Italian resident companies. Background to Italian Supreme Court Judgement No.1967/2020 The Supreme...
The 31st of January has come and gone and the UK has officially left the European Union. As the sign read outside the European parliament; “It’s not goodbye, it’s au revoir”. But let’s talk about goodbye. There is still a lot of uncertainty around the implications that Brexit will have on international withholding taxes. For now, these questions may be on the backburner while the UK enjoys a one-year transition period, allowing it to have access to the same EU-member rights that it had pre-Brexit. However, come the 1st of January 2021, foreign investors will need to be prepared for any withholding tax legislation changes that may occur. There are two main areas of withholding taxation that are likely to...
Pension funds are often entitled to reclaim 100% of their withholding tax (WHT) on foreign investment income. But do all Pension Funds know this is the case? Are you claiming the full amount that is owed to you? With over $200bn in taxes withheld from pension funds alone globally, you should ask, how much of it belongs to you. The Opportunities available to Tax-exempt Investors An opportunistic environment exists for pension funds seeking higher-yielding tax refunds. This is because pension funds are often entitled to reclaim a higher percentage (when compared with mutual funds) of the tax withheld on income from foreign securities and fixed income instruments. Furthermore, pensions funds should explore this tax reclaim opportunity because every unrecovered dollar...
We’ll be attending the FONDS professionell Conference 2020! Book a slot with us, let's grab a coffee and discuss the complex world of foreign withholding tax reclaim. We’ll be helping businesses explore every reclaim opportunity from Double taxation agreement claims to European Court of Justice claims. You owe it to your investments to increase your withholding tax refund yield. Book a slot with us! We’ll see you there! [gravityform id="2" title="true" description="true"]
Foreign investors should take advantage of the 2019-passed amendments to Finnish legislation related to the taxation of investment funds. These amendments came into force on January 1st 2020 and are aimed at making Finland a more attractive investment market as well as allowing Finnish investment management firms to explore international investment opportunities without added taxation costs. The changes to the legislation clarify the definitions of investment funds and special investment funds and outline the requirements for tax exemption for these entities. The amendments clarify the scope of the law, reduces the administrative burden on the management company and removes ambiguities regarding current regulation. In addition, the proposal implements nationally the money market regulation, the regulation on European venture capital funds...
For many global investment management companies, the completion of the W-8BEN-E form is complicated. Ultimately, the lack of understanding over its completion infringes on many investment firms’ ability to receive US dividend or interest payments at the treaty rate. This is especially true for those investment firms in developing countries. This guide explains the purpose of the IRS’s W-8BEN-E form within the context of foreign withholding tax and what role it plays within the US’s FATCA process. What is the W-8BEN-E Form? The W-8BEN-E form is a tax document that allows foreign companies to be exempt from the 30% US withholding tax on US source income. Whereas it’s sister document the W-8BEN form serves simply to confirm that you’re a...
Investors in Ireland must prepare for increased withholding tax rates in 2020 as Ireland increases the withholding tax rate in an effort to create a revenue boost to their exchequer. The dividend withholding tax percentage increased from the previous 20% to 25% and has been effective since 1 January 2020. The Irish Times reported that the move will come as a surprise to tax practitioners as it was not speculated as likely in advance of the budget and appears to be one of many revenue raising measures for 2020 which emerged late in negotiations. Foreign legal and natural persons with investments in Ireland will now suffer tax at the higher rate of 25%. Ultimately, should a company have existing procedures...
2020 looks set to be the year where investors secure profitable growth by venturing into new demographic segments and geographies, leaving their comfort zones to perform new activities and harnessing investment technology to unlock agility and value (source). But despite technological uptake and a more explorative approach to investing, most investors are still completely in the dark when it comes to the complex maze that is foreign dividend withholding tax benefits - An often overlooked aspect of profit contribution despite it adding considerably to ROI. In this article we discuss the challenges of withholding tax refunds, why most investors are not maximising these refund opportunities and how to turn what most consider sunk tax leakage into significant improvements in fund...
Introduction This guide to Double taxation Agreements and the withholding tax benefits, is intended to provide essential information of Double Taxation Agreements within the context of dividend withholding tax recovery. Why Foreign Investors Need to Understand International Double Taxation Treaties It has become a necessity for any foreign investor to understand the intricacies of international double taxation agreements. This is because as an investor, you will not be able to take full advantage of the benefits and rebates offered through these double tax treaty agreements if you don’t have a firm grasp of these laws. Furthermore, the benefits through double taxation agreement claims can often add considerable value to fund performance. Above all, in times of recession and unpredictable returns,...
As a political and economic union of sovereign states, understanding the regulatory framework of the European Union presents a unique challenge for investors. The mechanics of claiming withholding tax in the EU are a case in point. Any investor seeking to reclaim dividend withholding tax needs to take into account the relevant national legislation, as well as EU regulations, and then to consider how these may affect each other. That’s why we are so focused on research at WTax, and why we have local experts in place wherever a withholding tax claims needs to be made. We can get some insight into the complexities of reclaiming withholding tax in the EU by taking a step back and considering some of...
The free movement of capital is woven into the framework of the European Union. Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) states that “all restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited”. What are the limits on the prescribed free movement on capital? And how far does the principle of non-differentiation extend to investors based outside of the EU? The question was tested in Emerging Markets Series of DFA Investment Trust Company v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy (Case C-190/12), in which an investment fund based in the United States brought a case against the tax authority of Bydgoszcz, Poland. Impeding international investment?...
The European Single Market was founded on the principle of guaranteeing the “four freedoms” of open economies: free movement of capital, services, goods and labour between member states. The commitment to a common market with parity between states has clear implications for member-state tax fiscal policy, and for tax policy in particular. Free movement of capital is foundational to the agreement. Article 40 of the Agreement on the European Area is clear: within the framework of the agreement “there shall be no restrictions between the Contracting Parties on the movement of capital belonging to persons resident in EC Member States or EFTA States and no discrimination based on the nationality or on the place of residence of the parties or...
